Full cost control.
Why the cost rises while hires stay flat.
You pay for clicks, not for hires
Every click on a job board or a search ad costs the same whether the person is qualified, unqualified or a bot. The bill grows with traffic, not with outcomes.
Unqualified volume has a hidden cost
Each unsuitable application takes recruiter time to read and reject. That time never appears on the media invoice, but it is the largest part of the cost.
Every channel is bought separately
Boards, social and search each come with their own contract and their own budget. Nobody sees the cost per hire across all of them, so nothing gets rebalanced.
From cost per click to cost per candidate.
- ×You pay per click or per application, whatever the outcome
- ×Unqualified applicants cost media budget and recruiter hours
- ×Each channel has its own invoice and nobody sees the total
- ×The cost per hire is only known after the fact
Pay for outcomes, not clicks.
One budget across every channel
Your vacancies run as job ads on social, Google search, display and 600+ job boards from one platform and one budget, so spend goes where the qualified candidates come from instead of sitting in separate contracts.
Learn moreFilter before the cost lands on your team
Qualifying questions on intent, fit and availability sit inside the apply flow, so unsuitable applicants never reach your recruiters and the hidden cost of sorting disappears.
Learn moreA fixed price per interview-ready candidate
With Wonderkind Deliver the cost per interview-ready candidate is agreed upfront. You see who is qualified on your board, send them to your ATS, and the invoice matches the outcome.
Learn moreQuestions about cost.
Usually because you pay for clicks or applications rather than hires. Job boards and search ads charge per click whether or not the person is qualified, and every unqualified application adds recruiter time on top. Traffic grows, hires do not.