Every applicant screened, so every channel compared.
Why the reports do not add up.
Each channel measures itself
The job board counts views, the ad platform counts clicks, the ATS counts applications. Nobody counts the same thing, so nothing can be compared.
Clicks are not candidates
A channel that sends the most traffic can send the fewest people who can do the job. Judged on clicks, it looks like the winner.
Quality is only known months later
By the time you know which hires stayed, the budget for the next quarter is already spread the same way as before.
One platform, one measure.
All channels, one campaign
Social, Google search, display and 600+ job boards run from the same vacancy feed on the same platform, so every channel is measured the same way from the start.
Learn moreQuality known at the moment of applying
Because every applicant answers your qualifying questions, you know immediately how many from each channel are actually a fit, not months later when the hire is reviewed.
Learn moreApplications and qualified candidates, per channel
Your board shows where each qualified candidate came from. The gap between applications and interview-ready candidates per channel is the insight, and the budget can follow it.
Learn moreMeasure candidates, not clicks.
- ×Five channels, five dashboards, five definitions of success
- ×Budget follows clicks because clicks are what gets reported
- ×Nobody can say which channel the good hires came from
- ×Next quarter's spend is last quarter's spend
Questions about channels.
Because each channel measures a different thing. Job boards report views, ad platforms report clicks, your ATS reports applications, and none of them knows which applicant became a hire. There is no shared definition to compare on.